SKC

Sustainable Management

Climate Action

SKC는 2040 온실가스 넷 제로 및 RE100 달성을 선언하였으며, 전사 및 사업장 단위로 온실가스 감축 방안을 발굴하고 있습니다. 지속적으로 기후변화 대응 의지를 반영한 사업을 추진해 나가며 화석연료에서 재생에너지로의 전환 및 온실가스 배출 저감 소재의 사업화를 통해 기업시민으로서 기후위기 대응에 적극 동참해 나가겠습니다.

2040 GHG Net Zero

2040 Net Zero Roadmap

SKC’s ultimate Net Zero goal is to reduce net emission to ‘0’ by 2040. The goal has been identified in consideration of the 1.5℃ scenario of the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) and the SBTi standards. Furthermore, to make the ultimate goal more reachable and feasible, an interim target has been established to reduce net emission by 42% of the base year (2020) emission of 1.13 million tCO2eq by 2030.

SKC Net Zero Roadmap
  • Net Zero

    GHG Emission Reduction

    2030 42% reduction (vs 2020)

    2040 Achieve Net Zero

  • Renewable Energy

    Share of Renewable Energy

    2030 79%

    2040 100%

2040 Net Zero Implementation Strategy

The most important strategic instrument in SKC’s Net Zero implementation strategy is to achieve RE100 (Renewable Electricity 100%). SKC expects electricity consumption (Scope 2) to account for about 85% of its GHG emission as of 2030 and desires to reduce it by sourcing renewable energy. When adding production capacity/building new plants overseas in Malaysia, Poland, etc., SKC plans to achieve RE100 when such plants go live. Furthermore, SKC will reduce Scope 1 emission by improving process efficiency in the short run and work on energy transition from fossil fuel to electricity in the mid to long run, considering the maturity of available technologies.

Scope 3 Emission Control

Expanding the scope of Net Zero to supply chain, SKC has disclosed and controlled Scope 3 emission data verified by a 3rd party since 2023. Scope 3 covers greenhouse gases emitted indirectly not only in production of products but also the entire product lifecycle from raw material purchase to product use and scraping, rendering it difficult for SKC to reduce it single-handedly. Accordingly, SKC has selected critical control points out of 15 categories defined in Scope 3 in line with the characteristics of respective businesses, planning to develop a phase-wise reduction strategy in cooperation with key upstream and downstream stakeholders.

Criteria : 2023, Scope : SKC, SK nexilis, SK picglobal, SK enpulse

Climate related Risk Management

Transition Risks

The international community is ramping up GHG regulations to stop the earth temperature from rising. SKC, having a variety of stakeholders at home and abroad, analyzes the risks posed by regulations on climate change exacerbated by greenhouse gases and endeavors to launch preemptive responses. For one thing, SKC, subject to the emission credit trading system in Korea, has analyzed the financial impacts of such regulations derived from climate change scenarios. Concerning the 4th planning period (2026 to 2030) for which details are yet to be published, SKC has based analysis on the NDC scenario and the NGFS1) carbon pricing scenario, etc. If SKC emits greenhouse gases without any reduction initiative in Korea, about KRW 148 billion of cost is estimated to be incurred by 2030. To minimize such risks, We have adopted the Internal Carbon Price System, which is in full operation. Financial risks of carbon regulations will be factored in investment process, and GHG emission regulation risks will be addressed by direct reduction and expanding renewable energy proportion, according to the Net Zero roadmap. Furthermore, SKC anticipates that the EU CBAM recently introduced or plastic tax, etc. will emerge as mid to long-term transitions risks. As the applicable scope of the EU CBAM may have varying impacts on SKC products, SKC is closely monitoring and reviewing corresponding regulatory trends.

1) NGFS: Network for Greening the Financial System

Physical Risks

SKC has analyzed the physical risks that the climate change may have on each manufacturing site. SKC analyzed the IPCC SSP-RCP2) scenarios using S&P Global’s Climanomics® hazard model. Global climate risks for assets covered in the analysis were predicted and Impacts of eight climate risks3) were assessed by a quantitative economics model as the ratio of estimated loss4) to the present asset value.

2) SSP: Shared Socioeconomic Pathway, RCP: Representative Concentration Pathway
3) Abnormal temperature, drought, water shortage, coastal inundation, river flooding, typhoon, torrential rain
4) MAAL: Modeled Average Annual Loss

Physical Risk Analysis Findings (~’50)
  • SSP5-8.5 (Scenario in which mankind still depends on fossil fuel power generation, with sluggish progress in GHG emission reduction policy enforcement, resulting in the earth temperature rise of 4.4℃ by 2100)

  • High
    • Asset loss ratio attributable to extreme temperature was analyzed to be the highest. Enterprise-wide asset loss ratio by ’50 is estimated to reach 1.51%, which may vary, subject to SKC’s business portfolio expansion.
    • SK nexilis' business sites in Poland and Malaysia had loss rates of 1.71% and 0.93% respectively. Domestic business sites had a relatively lower loss rate at 0.19%.
  • Mid
    • Loss ratios from fluvial flooding and pluvial flooding were in the range of 0.2%, lower than extreme temperature in terms of criticality. Yet, fluvial flooding and pluvial flooding were still rated as the 2nd and the 3rd-most critical risks.
    • Enterprise-wide loss ratio related to fluvial flooding was 0.25%, SK nexilis' business site in Poland had a relatively higher rate of 0.16%, but other business sites had a relatively lower rate of under 0.1%.
    • Heavy rains are projected to cause a 0.27% loss rate for the entire company, with the site in Malaysia having the highest rate at 0.24%. The SK nexilis site in Poland had a slightly higher rate at 0.16% while domestic business sites were under 0.1%.
    • Water scarcity could lead to a 0.16% loss rate for the entire company. SK nexilis' site in Poland is estimated at 2%, which is higher than the entire company while the domestic and Malaysian business sites were at 0%.
  • Low
    • All loss ratios from drought, wild fire and tropical cyclone were found to be less than 0.1%, featuring low risk levels. Loss ratio from water stress and coastal flooding was analyzed to be 0% by ’50.
    • Business site with lower levels of physical risks derived from climate changes are those of SK nexilis in Malaysia. The site is projected to have a combined loss rate of 1.25% for the eight disasters.

In the IPCC SSP5-8.5 scenario, the physical risks seem to be maintained at the aforementioned trends on a longer time horizon beyond 2050.
SKC will analyze short/mid/long-term physical risks and develop a system of control and response addressing more relevant risk factors.